Skip to Content
Hablamos Español 602-428-7104
Negligent Security

Negligent Security Lawyer in Phoenix

Premises Liability & Inadequate Security Lawsuits

Accidents and injuries can occur nearly anywhere – including properties owned and operated by private individuals or businesses that failed to fix dangerous conditions they knew or should have known about.

While these “dangerous conditions” commonly include hazards such as open holes, slippery surfaces, and fenceless or unsupervised pools that can contribute to slip and falls or drowning accidents, it also includes dangers associated with third-party assaults and altercations that could have been prevented with adequate security precautions.

If security failures cause you or a loved one to suffer harm and injuries on another’s property, you may be entitled to compensation. Our Phoenix attorneys at MayesTelles are available to discuss your rights and options for pursuing a potential case. Call (602) 428-7104 or contact us online.

Premises Liability: Negligent & Inadequate Security

Premises liability is a legal theory applicable to property owners and their legal obligations to ensure the safety of visitors, guests, and invitees. In Arizona, property owners have a duty to take reasonable steps to address potential hazards which may foreseeably cause harm– whether that means fixing a dangerous condition or posting adequate warnings for hazards owners knew or should have known about, or taking other precautions to reduce risks of preventable injuries.

Premises liability claims are inherently unique and fact-specific, and may range in complexity from open and obvious hazards like a slippery supermarket floor to situations where the link between an owner’s negligence and a victim’s injury is not so clear. Negligent security claims are among these more difficult cases, as they commonly involve:

  • Robberies and theft committed by other guests or people
  • Gun violence or intentional / accidental shootings
  • Assault / battery, physical violence
  • Fights at bars, nightclubs, and other similar businesses
  • Sexual abuse or sexual assault
  • Altercations at hotels, sporting arenas, and other venues
  • Property management companies, security companies, and other third-party contractors

Examples of Security-Related Negligence

Negligent security claims generally allege a property owner failed in some way to take reasonable measures to ensure the safety of a premises and guests. This may stem from:

  • Failures to hire a security service or utilize easily obtainable security devices
  • Failure to employ an adequate number of security personnel
  • Insufficient lighting or insufficient monitoring of premises
  • Lack of security cameras / cameras not in working order
  • Failure to maintain or fix broken gates, locks, and other places of access
  • Failure to warn about potential dangers, risks of theft, or criminal activity
  • Failures to monitor premises, prohibit access or entry, or de-escalate an altercation
  • Lack of metal detectors / security and weapon checks
  • Failure to act on knowledge of crime and / or criminals on premises or its vicinity

While every case is unique, there are some general ways to support claims of negligent security. This includes accumulating any and all evidence related to the underlying event, including incident or police reports, witness information, surveillance footage, and electronic records maintained by property owners.

As a means of illustrating a property owner’s actual orconstructive knowledge of foreseeable dangers, attorneys will commonly work with investigators to evaluate the scene and location of an incident, and preserve evidence which may show:

  • Previous lawsuits filed over fights, robberies, or other crimes on the property;
  • A history of break-ins, theft, or complaints filed by residents / patrons;
  • Documentation of prior incidents from police reports, incident reports, and other sources;
  • The likelihood of physical violence and altercations at a business or location;
  • Pre-existing hazards that went unaddressed (i.e. broken lights or locks);

Proving a Claim

Generally, a premises liability claim will require plaintiffs to prove:

  1. A legal duty existed. In Arizona, property owners generally owe visitors and guests, but not trespassers, a legal duty to exercise reasonable care in maintaining a safe premises.
  2. The duty was breached. A property owner’s negligence and failure to address dangerous conditions constitutes a breach of duty.
  3. Causation. Provingthe property owner’s negligence caused the victim preventable harm; and
  4. Damages. Victimssuffered actual damages as a result of their accident / injuries.

Proving these essential elements looks different in every case, and especially so in those involving claims of insufficient, inadequate, or negligent security. However, when successful, these claims can allow victims and their families to recover losses arising from the incident, including costs of past and future medical bills, lost earnings and future wages, pain and suffering, and other economic and non-economic damages.

Though victims may also be entitled to compensation for property damage, Arizona does have laws limiting the liability of innkeepers who post signs stating they are not liable for lost or damages property not stored within a provided fireproof safe (A.R.S. 33-302).

Questions? Call (602) 428-7104 For a FREE Consultation

Whether your potential case involves a nightclub, bar, concert venue, or an apartment complex, premises liability claims alleging negligent security have many moving parts, and many potentially liable parties to investigate. As such, bringing your case to the attention of experienced attorneys is of the utmost importance – especially when preservation of evidence is critical, and the state of limitations for such cases is typically 2 years from the date of injury.

MayesTelles is comprised of award-winning attorneys who leverage over a century of collective experience. Discuss your rights and options for a personal injury case personally with a member of our team during a free consultation.

We've Won Thousands of Cases

  • Charges Reduced to Reckless Driving

    Client R.C. was stopped by Mesa Police for a civil traffic violation and later charged with DUI, Extreme DUI, and Super Extreme DUI in a justice court. During the course of their representation, MayesTelles attorneys discovered important inconsistencies in the police reports. When we presented these issues to the State, the prosecutor’s office agreed to drop all DUI charges.

  • Fatal Commercial Vehicle Accident

    MayesTelles Client A.F. and her husband tragically lost their unborn child as a result of the negligence of an individual operating a commercial vehicle in Yuma, Arizona. After substantial investigation including accident reconstruction and filing a lawsuit, the insurance company paid out the policy limits of $1,000,000.00.

  • 4 Counts of Aggravated DUI Dismissed

    Client M.W. was charged with 4 counts of Aggravated DUI in the Maricopa County Superior Court in July 2016 for allegedly riding a motorized bicycle under the influence. The attorneys at MayesTelles demanded that the State include certain materials in their presentation to the grand jury, resulting in the grand jury refusing to indict and the case being dismissed.

  • Client Charged with DUI

    Client, GS, charged with DUI - sentence was reduced to reckless driving.

  • Client Facing Assault Felony

    M.L. was charged with 1 count of Aggravated Assault, a class 3 dangerous felony. She plead guilty to Aggravated Assault, a class 6 undesignated felony, with a stipulation to 3 months of initial jail. She received credit for 32 days and the rest of the jail time was deferred. She was placed on 3 years of supervised probation. She has the opportunity to designate the offense a misdemeanor after successfully completing probation. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court

  • Client Charged with DUI

    Our client, A.R, was charged with 1 count of DUI and 1 count of Failure to Control Speed to Avoid a Collision. During extensive pre-trial investigation, it was discovered that the police made many errors in how they handled the case. We were able to get the client's charges reduced to reckless driving. Location: Glendale City Court

  • Client Charged with Four Felony Counts

    Our client, Ms. D., was charged with two counts of forgery - a class 4 Felony as well as theft - a class 2 Felony and also fraudulent schemes and artifices - a class 2 Felony. We were able to get her conviction reduced to a class 6 undesignated felony with the opportunity to reduce further to a misdemeanor. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court

  • Client Charged with Trespass & Assault

    Our client, T.C., was charged in Maricopa County Superior Court on July 8, 2015 with 1 count of Criminal Trespass, a class 6 felony, and 1 count Assault, a class 2 Misdemeanor. On September 9, 2015, after an 8-day jury trial, our client was found not guilty on both charges. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court

  • Client Charged with Shoplifting

    Our client, Ms. H., was charged with shoplifting - a class 1 misdemeanor. We were able to get her conviction set aside. Location: Phoenix Municipal Court

  • Client Faced 5 Felony Sex Offenses

    Our client, Mr. C., was charged with five counts of felony sex offenses, including two counts of Sex Conduct with a Minor and three counts of Molestation of a Child. We were able to get the case dismissed upon a successful Motion to Dismiss. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court

  • Client Charged with Disorderly Conduct

    Our client, K.F., was charged with Disorderly Conduct, a class 1 misdemeanor. We were able to get this client's case dismissed. Location: Tempe Municipal Court

  • Client Facing Multiple Criminal Charges

    Our client, L.S., was charged on October 20, 2014 in Mesa for an assault, disorderly conduct, and criminal damage. MayesTelles PLLC was able to get those charges dismissed.

  • Client Facing Multiple Domestic Violence Offenses

    Our client, Ms. C., was facing charges of assault / domestic violence (class 1 misdemeanor), disorderly conduct / domestic violence (class 1 misdemeanor), and criminal damage / domestic violence (class 1 misdemeanor). We were able to get our client's case dismissed. Location: Mesa Municipal Court

  • Charged with Assault & Failure to Appear

    Our client, L.S., was charged in Phoenix on December 27, 2014 for assault and failure to appear. After completing diversion, our client's case was dismissed.

  • Multiple Felony Theft Offenses

    Our client, Mr. C., was charged with Theft of Means of Transportation (Class 3 Felony) and Trafficking in Stolen Property (Class 3 Felony). Both class 3 felonies have a possible sentencing range of 2 - 8.75 years in prison. We were able to get our client's charge reduced to a Class 1 Misdemeanor with no jail time. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court

Why Choose MayesTelles PLLC?

  • Nearly 200 Years of Combined Experience
  • Thousands of Cases Successfully Handled
  • Voted Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • Available to Our Clients 24/7
  • Former Prosecutors & Law Enforcement
  • AV Preeminent Rated Attorneys

Contact Us Today

Start with a Free Case Evaluation
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy


Hear From Past Clients We've Helped
    "I would recommend them 1,000%"
    The entire staff was so kind and nobody treated me any different because of my past! There are no words I can give you to thank you for what your company has done for me!! Thank you so much!
    - K.H.
    "Only Pick MayesTelles"
    I sure hope to never get in trouble again but when I did I put my money and trust in MayesTelles. Not only do they listen, they CARE! As if it was them in my shoes! They don't judge you or make you feel uncomfortable and you can sit back and relax.
    - L. M.
    "Put My Mind at Ease"
    I never thought I would be someone needing a criminal lawyer. Choosing Mayes Telles was a great choice which has put my mind at ease. Melanie Laboy has been super responsive to my case and kept me informed during this entire process.
    - E.W.
    "I had a great experience and would definitely recommend David Lish."
    Got myself in some trouble and David Lish pulled me right out. He was really good at making me feel comfortable and helping me understand exactly what was going on with my case. David made my Felony go down to a misdemeanor and allowed me to come home to N
    - Elizabeth
    "Zach Thornley the greatest criminal lawyer at Mayes Telles"
    Zach turned hell to heaven (not guilty) for me and I will never say enough thank you for the fantastic job he did!!!!! Zach thank you
    - SG
    "The Best Lawyer in My Experience"
    David Telles is the best lawyer in my experience. It was a pretty big case, but he handled very professionally. My case was dismissed, I was very happy with the result and I am really thanks to David Telles.
    - Hanna
    "Professional, fair, and successful results for our clients."
    We are often asked what law firm do we see offers excellent advice and successful results for our clients and we tell them Mayes Telles. Blake Mayes, David Telles and Dean Turnbow have had fantastic communication with our office and our clients can't speak
    - Sanctuary Bail Bonds
    "Professional, fair, and successful results for our clients."
    We are often asked what law firm do we see offers excellent advice and successful results for our clients and we tell them Mayes Telles. Blake Mayes, David Telles and Dean Turnbow have had fantastic communication with our office...
    - Sanctuary Bail Bonds