Voyeurism Lawyer in Phoenix
Defending Against Voyeurism and “Peeping Tom” Crimes in Arizona
A voyeurism charge in Arizona can carry serious consequences. A conviction can mean prison time, sex offender registration, a felony record, and lasting damage to your reputation, career, and personal life.
If you have been arrested or are under investigation for voyeurism, MayesTelles is ready to help.
With us, you get a team of defense attorneys that includes:
- Several former Maricopa County prosecutors
- A former federal law enforcement specialist
- A retired police officer and Gulf War veteran
- A former Judge Pro Tem (Maricopa County Superior Court)
Together, we bring over 200+ years of experience to every case we handle. We have defended thousands of criminal cases and achieved complete dismissals and acquittals in sex crime cases across Maricopa County.
And, we have been voted Arizona's #1 Criminal Defense Firm by Ranking Arizona for seven years in a row.
Proven Results in Voyeurism Cases
Contact our Phoenix voyeurism defense lawyers at MayesTelles today for a free consultation.
We're available 24/7 – call now
Voyeurism Under Arizona Law — A.R.S. 13-1424
Arizona's voyeurism statute, A.R.S. § 13-1424, makes it unlawful to knowingly invade another person's privacy without their knowledge or consent for the purpose of sexual stimulation.
Under this law, a person can be charged with voyeurism for:
- Observing another person in a private setting without their knowledge or consent for sexual gratification
- Filming or photographing another person without their knowledge in a location where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy
- Recording a person who is nude or engaged in sexual activity without their consent
- Distributing or displaying images or videos produced in violation of another person's privacy
Voyeurism is a Class 5 felony when the conduct does not involve a recognizable depiction of the victim. It becomes a Class 4 felony when the person in the images or video is recognizable. If the alleged victim is a minor, the charges and penalties escalate significantly and may trigger Dangerous Crimes Against Children (DCAC) sentencing.
The Penalties for Voyeurism in Arizona
Below are the sentencing ranges for a first-time offender convicted of voyeurism in Arizona.
Class 5 Felony Voyeurism
- Minimum: 6 months
- Presumptive: 1.5 years
- Maximum: 2.5 years
Class 4 Felony Voyeurism
- Minimum: 1 year
- Presumptive: 2.5 years
- Maximum: 3.75 years
Sentencing exposure increases significantly for defendants with prior felony convictions.
When voyeurism charges are accompanied by related offenses, such as surreptitious recording, revenge porn, sexual extortion, or sexual exploitation of a minor, each additional count carries its own sentencing range. And while a voyeurism conviction does not automatically require sex offender registration, it can still be ordered by a judge.
Surreptitious Recording Under Arizona Law — A.R.S. 13-3019
Arizona has a separate but closely related statute that specifically addresses secret photographing, filming, and digital recording, A.R.S. § 13-3019, which is commonly known as “surreptitious recording.”
Under this statute, it is unlawful to knowingly photograph, videotape, film, digitally record, or secretly view another person without their consent in either of the following circumstances:
- In a restroom, bathroom, locker room, bedroom, or other location where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the person is urinating, defecating, dressing, undressing, nude, or engaged in sexual intercourse or sexual contact.
- In a manner that directly or indirectly captures or allows the viewing of the person's genitalia, buttocks, or female breast, whether clothed or unclothed, that is not otherwise visible to the public.
That second provision is broader than most people expect. It applies even in public spaces if the recording captures intimate areas that are not visible to bystanders, meaning someone who uses a hidden camera or phone to photograph up a person's clothing (e.g., “upskirting” or “downblousing”) in a public location is covered by this statute.
It's important to understand that this statute also covers viewing without a device. Peering through a gap in a bathroom stall or between dressing room panels can qualify even without any recording equipment.
The Penalties for Surreptitious Recording in Arizona
The penalty for surreptitious recording in Arizona depends on how the conduct occurred:
- Class 5 felony — violations involving the use of a device (camera, phone, recording equipment)
- Class 6 felony — violations that do not involve a device (secret viewing without recording)
- Class 5 felony — a Class 6 violation becomes a Class 5 felony on a second or subsequent offense
The statute also makes it separately unlawful to disclose, display, distribute, or publish a photograph, video, or recording made in violation of the statute without the consent of the person depicted.
Distribution charges can be filed independently of the underlying recording charge, meaning a defendant can face multiple counts: one for the recording and additional counts for each instance of distribution or sharing.
What Is the Difference Between Voyeurism & Surreptitious Recording?
While both statutes address privacy violations involving visual recording, there are meaningful differences.
Voyeurism under ARS § 13-1424 requires a sexual motivation element; the invasion of privacy must be for the purpose of sexual stimulation. Surreptitious photographing, recording, or viewing under § 13-3019 does not require a sexual motivation; the act of secret recording itself is the offense regardless of the purpose.
This distinction matters for defense strategy. It also means prosecutors have flexibility in how they charge these cases, and it is common to see both statutes charged simultaneously when the facts support it.
Possible Defenses to Voyeurism or Surreptitious Recording Charges
Every case is different, but the following defenses arise frequently in these matters:
- Consent: Both statutes require that the recording or observation occur without the other person's consent. If the alleged victim consented, or if there is genuine ambiguity about whether consent was given, that is a direct defense.
- No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: These crimes apply to locations where a reasonable expectation of privacy exists, or where intimate areas are not otherwise visible to the public. If the location or circumstances don't meet that standard, the charge may not hold.
- Lack of Sexual Motivation: Arizona's voyeurism statute requires that the invasion of privacy occur for the purpose of sexual stimulation. Security cameras, baby monitors, and other legitimate monitoring do not qualify.
- Statutory Exemptions: A.R.S. § 13-3019 includes exemptions for security monitoring with clearly posted notices, recordings made in correctional facilities for investigative purposes, and law enforcement investigations.
- Unlawful Search and Seizure: If a search warrant was overbroad, improperly obtained, or executed outside its scope, evidence gathered from seized devices can be challenged and potentially suppressed.
- Digital Attribution: The prosecution must prove that the defendant was the person who made, possessed, or distributed the recording. When devices were shared or involved remote storage, attribution is not always clear.
Contact Our Voyeurism Defense Attorneys in Phoenix
If you or someone you love has been arrested, had devices seized, or is under investigation for voyeurism or surreptitious recording in Arizona, contact MayesTelles now. We are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Common Questions
About Voyeurism Charges in Arizona
-
I had a hidden camera in my home. Can I be charged with voyeurism?It depends on where the camera was placed and who was recorded. A hidden camera in a bedroom, bathroom, or other private area of the home that captured another person without their consent, such as a guest, a roommate, or a domestic partner, can support charges for voyeurism and surreptitious recording. The fact that it was your own home does not eliminate the other person's reasonable expectation of privacy in a bathroom or bedroom setting. If you are facing charges in this situation, contact us immediately.
-
The person in the recording knew they were being filmed. Does that matter?Yes. Consent is a central element of the voyeurism statute in Arizona. If the person depicted consented to being recorded, that is a direct defense. The challenge is proving consent when the alleged victim disputes it. Documentation of consent, such as text messages, prior conversations, or other evidence that the recording was agreed to, becomes critical in these situations.
-
If I shared or sent the recording to someone, does that make the situation worse?It can. Distribution, disclosure, or sharing of a recording made in violation of § 13-3019 is a separately charged offense under the same statute. Each act of sharing can be its own count. Additionally, sharing recordings that depict intimate images without consent may trigger revenge porn charges, and if the person depicted is a minor, sexual exploitation of a minor (child pornography) charges may apply.
-
My devices were seized. What happens now?Law enforcement will conduct a forensic examination of seized devices, which can be a lengthy process. Charges may not be filed immediately. It is common for weeks or months to pass between a device seizure and formal charges. This period is critical. Contact an attorney now, before charges are filed. We can begin evaluating the circumstances of the seizure, assessing whether the warrant and search were lawful, and preparing your defense before the prosecution has completed its case.
-
Can I be charged for something I recorded years ago?Potentially, yes. Arizona's statute of limitations for felony sex crimes is generally seven years, and in some circumstances involving minors, it can be longer. Old recordings discovered on a device during an unrelated investigation, or brought to law enforcement's attention by a former partner, can still result in charges. If you are contacted by law enforcement about recordings that occurred in the past, contact our attorneys before responding.
-
Is it too late to call if I've already been charged?No. There is significant work to be done even after charges are filed, such as challenging the search and seizure, evaluating the digital forensics, filing evidentiary motions, negotiating with the prosecution, and preparing for trial if necessary. The earlier you involve an attorney, the more options are available, but if you have already been charged, call us today. We are available to discuss your case 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
We've Won Thousands of Cases
From complete case dismissals in Dangerous Crimes Against Children matters to DUI charges dropped to reckless driving — here is a sample of what our attorneys have achieved for clients across Phoenix and Arizona.
-
Multiple Counts of Sex Crimes
Our client faced multiple charges, including: Sexual Exploitation of a Minor, Voyeurism, and Tampering with Physical Evidence. We were able to get our client's charges reduced to one count of Negligent Child Abuse.
-
Client Faced 5 Felony Sex Offenses
Our client, Mr. C., was charged with five counts of felony sex offenses, including two counts of Sex Conduct with a Minor and three counts of Molestation of a Child. We were able to get the case dismissed upon a successful Motion to Dismiss. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
-
Client Charged with Prostitution
MayesTelles was able to achieve a case dismissal on behalf of a client charged with Prostitution.
-
Dangerous Crime Against Children Charge
Our client was charged with Sexual Conduct with a Minor, which in Arizona is a Dangerous Crime Against Children. We were able to take this serious felony sex offense and achieve a complete case dismissal for our client.
-
Client Acquitted in Jury Trial
Client JG was charged with Indecent Exposure, a Class 1 Misdemeanor, in the East Mesa Justice Court. We had a jury trial and JG was acquitted of the charge.
-
Child Molestation, Sexual Conduct with a Minor, and Aggravated Assault
Client RJ was falsely accused of 18 counts Child Molestation, Sexual Conduct with a Minor, and Aggravated Assault. During the course of their representation, the attorneys at MayesTelles were able to force the State to dismiss half of the counts. The case proceeded to trial on the remaining counts. Following a lengthy trial, the jury acquitted RJ of all charges.
Why Choose MayesTelles PLLC?
-
200+ Years of Combined ExperienceExperience spanning criminal defense, personal injury & immigration
-
1,000+ Cases · Acquittals & Case Dismissals
Felonies, misdemeanors, sex crimes, DUI, drug charges & more
-
Top 100 Trial Lawyers — both founding partners
The National Trial Lawyers · Invite only · Mayes & Telles
-
Available 24/7 — including weekends & holidays
We pick up. Pre-charge intervention available from the first call.
-
Former Prosecutors & Law Enforcement
MCAO Sex Crimes Unit · DEA · Secret Service · U.S. Air Force
-
AV Preeminent® · J. Blake Mayes
Martindale-Hubbell® highest peer rating · Since 2009