Skip to Content
Top
Furnishing Harmful Materials to a Minor

Furnishing Harmful or Obscene Materials to a Minor Lawyer in Phoenix

Accused of Sending or Providing Explicit Materials to a Minor?

If you were charged with furnishing harmful or obscene materials to a minor, or police are investigating messages, images, links, files, or online communications, the time to involve defense counsel is now. 

At MayesTelles, we’ve been voted Arizona’s #1 Criminal Defense Firm by Ranking Arizona for seven consecutive years and bring 200+ years of combined experience to serious criminal cases across Arizona.

Get Started on Your Defense with a Free Consultation

We Take Calls 24/7 – Don't Wait

What Is Furnishing Harmful Items to Minors in Arizona?

Arizona has two related statutes for furnishing harmful items to minors.

A.R.S. § 13-3506 applies to furnishing harmful items to minors outside of internet transmission. The statute makes it unlawful, with knowledge of the character of the item, to recklessly furnish, present, provide, make available, give, lend, show, advertise, or distribute to minors any item that is harmful to minors. 

A.R.S. § 13-3506.01 applies to internet activity. It prohibits intentionally or knowingly transmitting or sending an item that is harmful to minors over the internet when the person knows or has reason to know that a minor will receive it. 

The statute also states that posting material on a website is not the same as transmitting or sending an item over the internet, and that it is not a defense that the recipient was a peace officer posing as a minor. 

In practice, these cases can involve allegations such as:

  • Sending sexual images, videos, links, or files to a minor 
  • Showing or giving printed sexual materials to a minor 
  • Sharing explicit content in a direct message, text, or app conversation 
  • Providing access to harmful materials through a device, account, or file 
  • Communicating with an undercover officer posing as a minor 

What Does “Harmful to Minors” Mean?

Arizona law does not treat every sexual reference, image, or adult-themed communication as “harmful to minors.” Under A.R.S. § 13-3501, material is harmful to minors only when it describes or represents nudity, sexual activity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or sadomasochistic abuse and, taken as a whole, meets the statute’s test. 

That test looks at whether the item appeals to prurient interest, portrays the material in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors. 

The definition is important because the State must prove more than discomfort, embarrassment, or poor judgment. The defense should examine the actual item, the full context, the intended audience, whether the material is being viewed as a whole, and whether prosecutors are characterizing it more harshly than the evidence supports.

What the Evidence Has to Prove in These Cases

Furnishing harmful materials cases focus on knowledge, age, and the character of the item. 

Your defense team should examine:

  • The item itself — What was allegedly shown, sent, provided, or made available? 
  • Method of furnishing — Was this a physical item, in-person conduct, direct internet transmission, or something else? 
  • Knowledge of character — Can the State prove the accused knew or had reason to know the nature of the item? 
  • Knowledge of age — Can prosecutors prove the accused knew or had reason to know the recipient was a minor? 
  • Harmful-to-minors definition — Does the material meet Arizona’s statutory test? 
  • Digital attribution — If the allegation involves the internet, can the State prove who controlled the account, device, message, link, or file? 

Arizona’s definition of “knowledge of the character” includes awareness, reason to know, or a belief that warrants further inspection or inquiry regarding the item’s contents. The definition also addresses knowledge of the minor’s age and recognizes an honest mistake excuse if the defendant made a reasonable, bona fide attempt to ascertain the minor’s true age. 

Penalties for Furnishing Harmful Materials to a Minor

In Arizona, furnishing harmful or obscene materials to a minor is a Class 4 felony. 

For a first-time felony offender, Arizona’s general Class 4 felony sentencing range is 1 year to 3.75 years in prison, with a presumptive term of 2.5 years. Sentencing exposure may increase if prosecutors file related charges, allege prior felony convictions, or claim the conduct overlaps with another sex crime or exploitation offense.

Don't Wait to Take Action When Your Future Is on the Line

If you were arrested, charged, or contacted by police about providing explicit materials to a minor, our defense attorneys at MayesTelles are here to help. We’re available 24/7 and serve clients across the state.

Call (602) 428-7104 to speak with a Phoenix furnishing harmful materials to a minor attorney.

Common Questions

About Furnishing Harmful Items to a Minor Charges in Arizona
  • Is Furnishing Harmful Items to a Minor a Felony in Arizona?

    Yes. Furnishing harmful items to minors under A.R.S. § 13-3506 and internet-based furnishing under A.R.S. § 13-3506.01 are both Class 4 felonies.

  • What If I Thought the Person Was 18?

    Age knowledge can be a major issue. Arizona law recognizes an honest mistake excuse under this chapter if the defendant made a reasonable, bona fide attempt to determine the minor’s true age. The defense should examine what was said, what the profile showed, whether the accused asked about age, and whether the State is relying on assumptions.

  • What If the Recipient Was an Undercover Officer?

    For internet-based allegations under A.R.S. § 13-3506.01, Arizona law states that it is not a defense that the recipient was a peace officer posing as a minor. That does not end the case. The defense may still challenge knowledge, intent, digital attribution, police conduct, the content itself, and whether the statute applies to the alleged transmission.

  • What Should I Do If Police Took My Devices or Want to Talk?

    Do not make statements, provide passwords, consent to additional searches, or try to explain the messages without legal counsel. These cases often involve device extractions, screenshots, account records, school or parent complaints, and undercover communications. Early defense involvement can help protect your rights before the case hardens.

We've Won Thousands of Cases

From complete case dismissals in Dangerous Crimes Against Children matters to DUI charges dropped to reckless driving — here is a sample of what our attorneys have achieved for clients across Phoenix and Arizona.

  • Multiple Counts of Sex Crimes

    Our client faced multiple charges, including: Sexual Exploitation of a Minor, Voyeurism, and Tampering with Physical Evidence. We were able to get our client's charges reduced to one count of Negligent Child Abuse.

  • Client Faced 5 Felony Sex Offenses

    Our client, Mr. C., was charged with five counts of felony sex offenses, including two counts of Sex Conduct with a Minor and three counts of Molestation of a Child. We were able to get the case dismissed upon a successful Motion to Dismiss. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court

  • Client Charged with Prostitution

    MayesTelles was able to achieve a case dismissal on behalf of a client charged with Prostitution.

  • Dangerous Crime Against Children Charge

    Our client was charged with Sexual Conduct with a Minor, which in Arizona is a Dangerous Crime Against Children. We were able to take this serious felony sex offense and achieve a complete case dismissal for our client.

  • Client Acquitted in Jury Trial

    Client JG was charged with Indecent Exposure, a Class 1 Misdemeanor, in the East Mesa Justice Court. We had a jury trial and JG was acquitted of the charge.

  • Child Molestation, Sexual Conduct with a Minor, and Aggravated Assault

    Client RJ was falsely accused of 18 counts Child Molestation, Sexual Conduct with a Minor, and Aggravated Assault. During the course of their representation, the attorneys at MayesTelles were able to force the State to dismiss half of the counts. The case proceeded to trial on the remaining counts. Following a lengthy trial, the jury acquitted RJ of all charges.

Why Choose MayesTelles PLLC?

  • 200+ Years of Combined Experience
    Experience spanning criminal defense, personal injury & immigration
  • 1,000+ Cases · Acquittals & Case Dismissals

    Felonies, misdemeanors, sex crimes, DUI, drug charges & more

  • Top 100 Trial Lawyers — both founding partners

    The National Trial Lawyers · Invite only · Mayes & Telles

  • Available 24/7 — including weekends & holidays

    We pick up. Pre-charge intervention available from the first call.

  • Former Prosecutors & Law Enforcement

    MCAO Sex Crimes Unit · DEA · Secret Service · U.S. Air Force

  • AV Preeminent® · J. Blake Mayes

    Martindale-Hubbell® highest peer rating · Since 2009

Contact Us Today

Start with a Free Case Evaluation
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to receive text messages from MayesTelles PLLC at the number provided, including those related to your inquiry, follow-ups, and review requests, via automated technology. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg & data rates may apply. Msg frequency may vary. Reply STOP to cancel or HELP for assistance. Acceptable Use Policy

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

Hear From Past Clients We've Helped
    "I would recommend them 1,000%"
    The entire staff was so kind and nobody treated me any different because of my past! There are no words I can give you to thank you for what your company has done for me!! Thank you so much!
    - K.H.
    "Only Pick MayesTelles"
    I sure hope to never get in trouble again but when I did I put my money and trust in MayesTelles. Not only do they listen, they CARE! As if it was them in my shoes! They don't judge you or make you feel uncomfortable and you can sit back and relax.
    - L. M.
    "Put My Mind at Ease"
    I never thought I would be someone needing a criminal lawyer. Choosing Mayes Telles was a great choice which has put my mind at ease. Melanie Laboy has been super responsive to my case and kept me informed during this entire process.
    - E.W.
    "I had a great experience and would definitely recommend David Lish."
    Got myself in some trouble and David Lish pulled me right out. He was really good at making me feel comfortable and helping me understand exactly what was going on with my case. David made my Felony go down to a misdemeanor and allowed me to come home to N
    - Elizabeth
    "Zach Thornley the greatest criminal lawyer at Mayes Telles"
    Zach turned hell to heaven (not guilty) for me and I will never say enough thank you for the fantastic job he did!!!!! Zach thank you
    - SG
    "The Best Lawyer in My Experience"
    David Telles is the best lawyer in my experience. It was a pretty big case, but he handled very professionally. My case was dismissed, I was very happy with the result and I am really thanks to David Telles.
    - Hanna
    "Professional, fair, and successful results for our clients."
    We are often asked what law firm do we see offers excellent advice and successful results for our clients and we tell them Mayes Telles. Blake Mayes, David Telles and Dean Turnbow have had fantastic communication with our office and our clients can't speak
    - Sanctuary Bail Bonds
    "Professional, fair, and successful results for our clients."
    We are often asked what law firm do we see offers excellent advice and successful results for our clients and we tell them Mayes Telles. Blake Mayes, David Telles and Dean Turnbow have had fantastic communication with our office...
    - Sanctuary Bail Bonds