Furnishing Harmful or Obscene Materials to a Minor Lawyer in Phoenix
Accused of Sending or Providing Explicit Materials to a Minor?
If you were charged with furnishing harmful or obscene materials to a minor, or police are investigating messages, images, links, files, or online communications, the time to involve defense counsel is now.
At MayesTelles, we’ve been voted Arizona’s #1 Criminal Defense Firm by Ranking Arizona for seven consecutive years and bring 200+ years of combined experience to serious criminal cases across Arizona.
What Is Furnishing Harmful Items to Minors in Arizona?
Arizona has two related statutes for furnishing harmful items to minors.
A.R.S. § 13-3506 applies to furnishing harmful items to minors outside of internet transmission. The statute makes it unlawful, with knowledge of the character of the item, to recklessly furnish, present, provide, make available, give, lend, show, advertise, or distribute to minors any item that is harmful to minors.
A.R.S. § 13-3506.01 applies to internet activity. It prohibits intentionally or knowingly transmitting or sending an item that is harmful to minors over the internet when the person knows or has reason to know that a minor will receive it.
The statute also states that posting material on a website is not the same as transmitting or sending an item over the internet, and that it is not a defense that the recipient was a peace officer posing as a minor.
In practice, these cases can involve allegations such as:
- Sending sexual images, videos, links, or files to a minor
- Showing or giving printed sexual materials to a minor
- Sharing explicit content in a direct message, text, or app conversation
- Providing access to harmful materials through a device, account, or file
- Communicating with an undercover officer posing as a minor
What Does “Harmful to Minors” Mean?
Arizona law does not treat every sexual reference, image, or adult-themed communication as “harmful to minors.” Under A.R.S. § 13-3501, material is harmful to minors only when it describes or represents nudity, sexual activity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or sadomasochistic abuse and, taken as a whole, meets the statute’s test.
That test looks at whether the item appeals to prurient interest, portrays the material in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.
The definition is important because the State must prove more than discomfort, embarrassment, or poor judgment. The defense should examine the actual item, the full context, the intended audience, whether the material is being viewed as a whole, and whether prosecutors are characterizing it more harshly than the evidence supports.
What the Evidence Has to Prove in These Cases
Furnishing harmful materials cases focus on knowledge, age, and the character of the item.
Your defense team should examine:
- The item itself — What was allegedly shown, sent, provided, or made available?
- Method of furnishing — Was this a physical item, in-person conduct, direct internet transmission, or something else?
- Knowledge of character — Can the State prove the accused knew or had reason to know the nature of the item?
- Knowledge of age — Can prosecutors prove the accused knew or had reason to know the recipient was a minor?
- Harmful-to-minors definition — Does the material meet Arizona’s statutory test?
- Digital attribution — If the allegation involves the internet, can the State prove who controlled the account, device, message, link, or file?
Arizona’s definition of “knowledge of the character” includes awareness, reason to know, or a belief that warrants further inspection or inquiry regarding the item’s contents. The definition also addresses knowledge of the minor’s age and recognizes an honest mistake excuse if the defendant made a reasonable, bona fide attempt to ascertain the minor’s true age.
Penalties for Furnishing Harmful Materials to a Minor
In Arizona, furnishing harmful or obscene materials to a minor is a Class 4 felony.
For a first-time felony offender, Arizona’s general Class 4 felony sentencing range is 1 year to 3.75 years in prison, with a presumptive term of 2.5 years. Sentencing exposure may increase if prosecutors file related charges, allege prior felony convictions, or claim the conduct overlaps with another sex crime or exploitation offense.
Don't Wait to Take Action When Your Future Is on the Line
If you were arrested, charged, or contacted by police about providing explicit materials to a minor, our defense attorneys at MayesTelles are here to help. We’re available 24/7 and serve clients across the state.
Call (602) 428-7104 to speak with a Phoenix furnishing harmful materials to a minor attorney.
Common Questions
About Furnishing Harmful Items to a Minor Charges in Arizona
-
Is Furnishing Harmful Items to a Minor a Felony in Arizona?
Yes. Furnishing harmful items to minors under A.R.S. § 13-3506 and internet-based furnishing under A.R.S. § 13-3506.01 are both Class 4 felonies.
-
What If I Thought the Person Was 18?
Age knowledge can be a major issue. Arizona law recognizes an honest mistake excuse under this chapter if the defendant made a reasonable, bona fide attempt to determine the minor’s true age. The defense should examine what was said, what the profile showed, whether the accused asked about age, and whether the State is relying on assumptions.
-
What If the Recipient Was an Undercover Officer?
For internet-based allegations under A.R.S. § 13-3506.01, Arizona law states that it is not a defense that the recipient was a peace officer posing as a minor. That does not end the case. The defense may still challenge knowledge, intent, digital attribution, police conduct, the content itself, and whether the statute applies to the alleged transmission.
-
What Should I Do If Police Took My Devices or Want to Talk?
Do not make statements, provide passwords, consent to additional searches, or try to explain the messages without legal counsel. These cases often involve device extractions, screenshots, account records, school or parent complaints, and undercover communications. Early defense involvement can help protect your rights before the case hardens.
We've Won Thousands of Cases
From complete case dismissals in Dangerous Crimes Against Children matters to DUI charges dropped to reckless driving — here is a sample of what our attorneys have achieved for clients across Phoenix and Arizona.
-
Multiple Counts of Sex Crimes
Our client faced multiple charges, including: Sexual Exploitation of a Minor, Voyeurism, and Tampering with Physical Evidence. We were able to get our client's charges reduced to one count of Negligent Child Abuse.
-
Client Faced 5 Felony Sex Offenses
Our client, Mr. C., was charged with five counts of felony sex offenses, including two counts of Sex Conduct with a Minor and three counts of Molestation of a Child. We were able to get the case dismissed upon a successful Motion to Dismiss. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
-
Client Charged with Prostitution
MayesTelles was able to achieve a case dismissal on behalf of a client charged with Prostitution.
-
Dangerous Crime Against Children Charge
Our client was charged with Sexual Conduct with a Minor, which in Arizona is a Dangerous Crime Against Children. We were able to take this serious felony sex offense and achieve a complete case dismissal for our client.
-
Client Acquitted in Jury Trial
Client JG was charged with Indecent Exposure, a Class 1 Misdemeanor, in the East Mesa Justice Court. We had a jury trial and JG was acquitted of the charge.
-
Child Molestation, Sexual Conduct with a Minor, and Aggravated Assault
Client RJ was falsely accused of 18 counts Child Molestation, Sexual Conduct with a Minor, and Aggravated Assault. During the course of their representation, the attorneys at MayesTelles were able to force the State to dismiss half of the counts. The case proceeded to trial on the remaining counts. Following a lengthy trial, the jury acquitted RJ of all charges.
Why Choose MayesTelles PLLC?
-
200+ Years of Combined ExperienceExperience spanning criminal defense, personal injury & immigration
-
1,000+ Cases · Acquittals & Case Dismissals
Felonies, misdemeanors, sex crimes, DUI, drug charges & more
-
Top 100 Trial Lawyers — both founding partners
The National Trial Lawyers · Invite only · Mayes & Telles
-
Available 24/7 — including weekends & holidays
We pick up. Pre-charge intervention available from the first call.
-
Former Prosecutors & Law Enforcement
MCAO Sex Crimes Unit · DEA · Secret Service · U.S. Air Force
-
AV Preeminent® · J. Blake Mayes
Martindale-Hubbell® highest peer rating · Since 2009