Arizona Dangerous Crimes Against Children Lawyer
Charged with a DCAC Offense? Call MayesTelles 24/7
Dangerous crimes against children, often called DCAC offenses, are among the most serious allegations a person can face in Arizona. A DCAC designation can turn an already serious felony into a case involving mandatory prison, long sentencing ranges, strict release limits, consecutive sentences, and life-changing collateral consequences.
If you were arrested, charged, or contacted by police about an alleged offense involving a child under the age of 15, the State may already be looking at A.R.S. § 13-705 sentencing. At MayesTelles PLLC, we defend clients facing serious felony and sex crime allegations throughout the Phoenix metro area and across Arizona.
We are a team of former prosecutors with 200+ years of experience. We have handled thousands of criminal cases across the state and secured complete dismissals in cases involving DCAC allegations.
Call us at (602) 428-7104. Consultations are free, and we are available 24/7. Se habla español.
Proven Results in Serious Felony Cases
MayesTelles PLLC has secured more than 1,000 acquittals and case dismissals for clients across Arizona, along with numerous positive outcomes involving reduced penalties, avoided jail time, and reduced charges.
Some examples of our results:
- Five Felony Sex Offenses Dismissed — Client faced five felony sex offense counts, including sexual conduct with a minor and molestation of a child.
- Multiple Child Abuse Charges Dismissed — Client faced two Class 4 felony child abuse counts and one Class 6 felony failure-to-report allegation.
- Multiple Sex Crime Charges Reduced — Client faced sexual exploitation of a minor, voyeurism, and tampering with physical evidence. Charges reduced to one count of negligent child abuse.
Read about other case victories
What Is a Dangerous Crime Against Children in Arizona?
A dangerous crime against children is a sentencing classification (not a separate charge) under A.R.S. § 13-705 that applies when three conditions are met:
- The offense is one of the enumerated eligible crimes,
- The defendant was an adult or tried as an adult, and
- The alleged victim was under 15.
When those conditions are met, Arizona’s normal felony sentencing rules no longer apply.
Arizona law lists specific offenses that can qualify as dangerous crimes against children, including:
- Sexual assault
- Molestation of a child
- Sexual conduct with a minor
- Sexual abuse
- Child sex trafficking
- Commercial sexual exploitation of a minor
- Sexual exploitation of a minor
- Kidnapping
- Luring a minor
- Continuous sexual abuse of a child
- Sexual extortion
- Certain violent or drug-related offenses involving minors
- Child abuse under certain circumstances
The list matters because not every case involving a minor is automatically a DCAC case. The defense should examine whether the alleged offense qualifies, whether the age element can be proven, and whether the State is applying A.R.S. § 13-705 correctly.
First-Degree and Second-Degree DCAC Allegations
Arizona law separates dangerous crimes against children into first-degree and second-degree categories.
A DCAC is generally considered:
- First degree if the offense was completed
- Second degree if the offense was preparatory (with a specific exception for attempted first-degree murder)
That distinction can affect sentencing. Preparatory offenses may still carry severe prison exposure, but completed offenses are often punished more harshly. Charging language, alleged conduct, age-related proof, and the exact statute involved all need careful review by an experienced DCAC defense attorney, like those at MayesTelles.
What the State Must Prove
DCAC cases are often built around the underlying charge plus the sentencing classification. That means the State must prove more than a general accusation involving a child.
In practice, the fight often centers on:
- The underlying offense — Can the State prove every element of the charged crime?
- Age-related proof — Can prosecutors prove the alleged victim was under 15, or that a fictitious or undercover person was represented as under 15 and the accused knew or had reason to know that?
- The DCAC classification — Does A.R.S. § 13-705 apply to the charged offense and alleged facts?
- Evidence reliability — Do forensic interviews, digital records, medical evidence, witness statements, or law enforcement reports support the allegation?
- Overcharging — Is the State using the DCAC label to increase pressure before the evidence has been tested?
Penalties Under Arizona's DCAC Statute
Arizona’s DCAC statute carries some of the harshest sentencing rules in the state.
Penalties depend on the offense, the alleged victim’s age, whether the case is first degree or second degree, and whether the accused has prior predicate felony convictions.
Examples of sentencing exposure under A.R.S. § 13-705 include:
- Certain first-degree DCAC offenses like sexual assault, sexual conduct with a minor, child sex trafficking, or commercial sexual exploitation may carry 13 to 27 years in prison, with a presumptive term of 20 years.
- Some offenses, including molestation of a child, sexual exploitation of a minor, aggravated luring, kidnapping, child abuse, and related allegations, may carry 10 to 24 years in prison, with a presumptive term of 17 years.
- Continuous sexual abuse of a child carries a sentencing range of 39 to 81 years, with a presumptive term of 60 years.
- Some second-degree DCAC offenses carry 5 to 15 years in prison, with a presumptive term of 10 years.
A.R.S. § 13-705 also includes strict release limitations and consecutive sentencing rules. In most DCAC cases, sentences run consecutively rather than at the same time. The main exceptions involve molestation of a child and sexual abuse when there is a single victim. When prosecutors file multiple DCAC counts, total exposure can compound quickly.
Charges also carry more than criminal penalties. This includes difficulties with employment and licensing, an impact on immigration status, and issues with housing and child custody, as well as mandatory sex offender registration.
How DCAC Cases Are Built & How We Dismantle Them
DCAC cases often begin long before formal charges are filed.
Police may collect statements, seize devices, request passwords, execute search warrants, interview children, review medical records, or gather reports from schools, family members, therapists, or online platforms.
Your defense team can examine how the case was built, including:
- Whether interviews were properly conducted
- Whether statements changed over time
- Whether digital evidence was collected lawfully
- Whether the State is relying on incomplete screenshots, messages, or account records
- Whether medical or forensic evidence actually supports the allegation
- Whether family conflict, custody issues, pressure from others, or outside influence affected the report
Early defense involvement can help protect statements, preserve favorable evidence, address warrant issues, and communicate with investigators before the case hardens.
A strong defense starts by separating the accusation from what the evidence can prove. DCAC cases can involve serious allegations, but they also frequently turn on small details, inconsistent statements, digital context, and whether the State is stretching the law. As former felony prosecutors, we know these cases from the inside out.
Don't Wait to Get Started on Your Defense – Call Now
If you were arrested, charged, or contacted by police about a dangerous crime against children allegation, our Phoenix DCAC defense attorneys at MayesTelles can help you fight back.
We serve clients across Maricopa County and Arizona, are available 24/7, and offer flexible payment plans. Call (602) 428-7104 or contact us online for a free consultation. Se habla español.
We've Won Thousands of Cases
From complete case dismissals in Dangerous Crimes Against Children matters to DUI charges dropped to reckless driving — here is a sample of what our attorneys have achieved for clients across Phoenix and Arizona.
-
Charges Reduced to Reckless Driving
Client R.C. was stopped by Mesa Police for a civil traffic violation and later charged with DUI, Extreme DUI, and Super Extreme DUI in a justice court. During the course of their representation, MayesTelles attorneys discovered important inconsistencies in the police reports. When we presented these issues to the State, the prosecutor’s office agreed to drop all DUI charges.
-
Fatal Commercial Vehicle Accident
MayesTelles Client A.F. and her husband tragically lost their unborn child as a result of the negligence of an individual operating a commercial vehicle in Yuma, Arizona. After substantial investigation including accident reconstruction and filing a lawsuit, the insurance company paid out the policy limits of $1,000,000.00.
-
4 Counts of Aggravated DUI Dismissed
Client M.W. was charged with 4 counts of Aggravated DUI in the Maricopa County Superior Court in July 2016 for allegedly riding a motorized bicycle under the influence. The attorneys at MayesTelles demanded that the State include certain materials in their presentation to the grand jury, resulting in the grand jury refusing to indict and the case being dismissed.
-
Client Charged with DUI
Client, GS, charged with DUI - sentence was reduced to reckless driving.
-
Client Facing Assault Felony
M.L. was charged with 1 count of Aggravated Assault, a class 3 dangerous felony. She plead guilty to Aggravated Assault, a class 6 undesignated felony, with a stipulation to 3 months of initial jail. She received credit for 32 days and the rest of the jail time was deferred. She was placed on 3 years of supervised probation. She has the opportunity to designate the offense a misdemeanor after successfully completing probation. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
-
Client Charged with DUI
Our client, A.R, was charged with 1 count of DUI and 1 count of Failure to Control Speed to Avoid a Collision. During extensive pre-trial investigation, it was discovered that the police made many errors in how they handled the case. We were able to get the client's charges reduced to reckless driving. Location: Glendale City Court
-
Client Charged with Four Felony Counts
Our client, Ms. D., was charged with two counts of forgery - a class 4 Felony as well as theft - a class 2 Felony and also fraudulent schemes and artifices - a class 2 Felony. We were able to get her conviction reduced to a class 6 undesignated felony with the opportunity to reduce further to a misdemeanor. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
-
Client Charged with Trespass & Assault
Our client, T.C., was charged in Maricopa County Superior Court on July 8, 2015 with 1 count of Criminal Trespass, a class 6 felony, and 1 count Assault, a class 2 Misdemeanor. On September 9, 2015, after an 8-day jury trial, our client was found not guilty on both charges. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
-
Client Charged with Shoplifting
Our client, Ms. H., was charged with shoplifting - a class 1 misdemeanor. We were able to get her conviction set aside. Location: Phoenix Municipal Court
-
Client Faced 5 Felony Sex Offenses
Our client, Mr. C., was charged with five counts of felony sex offenses, including two counts of Sex Conduct with a Minor and three counts of Molestation of a Child. We were able to get the case dismissed upon a successful Motion to Dismiss. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
-
Client Charged with Disorderly Conduct
Our client, K.F., was charged with Disorderly Conduct, a class 1 misdemeanor. We were able to get this client's case dismissed. Location: Tempe Municipal Court
-
Client Facing Multiple Criminal Charges
Our client, L.S., was charged on October 20, 2014 in Mesa for an assault, disorderly conduct, and criminal damage. MayesTelles PLLC was able to get those charges dismissed.
-
Client Facing Multiple Domestic Violence Offenses
Our client, Ms. C., was facing charges of assault / domestic violence (class 1 misdemeanor), disorderly conduct / domestic violence (class 1 misdemeanor), and criminal damage / domestic violence (class 1 misdemeanor). We were able to get our client's case dismissed. Location: Mesa Municipal Court
-
Charged with Assault & Failure to Appear
Our client, L.S., was charged in Phoenix on December 27, 2014 for assault and failure to appear. After completing diversion, our client's case was dismissed.
-
Multiple Felony Theft Offenses
Our client, Mr. C., was charged with Theft of Means of Transportation (Class 3 Felony) and Trafficking in Stolen Property (Class 3 Felony). Both class 3 felonies have a possible sentencing range of 2 - 8.75 years in prison. We were able to get our client's charge reduced to a Class 1 Misdemeanor with no jail time. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
Why Choose MayesTelles PLLC?
-
200+ Years of Combined ExperienceExperience spanning criminal defense, personal injury & immigration
-
1,000+ Cases · Acquittals & Case Dismissals
Felonies, misdemeanors, sex crimes, DUI, drug charges & more
-
Top 100 Trial Lawyers — both founding partners
The National Trial Lawyers · Invite only · Mayes & Telles
-
Available 24/7 — including weekends & holidays
We pick up. Pre-charge intervention available from the first call.
-
Former Prosecutors & Law Enforcement
MCAO Sex Crimes Unit · DEA · Secret Service · U.S. Air Force
-
AV Preeminent® · J. Blake Mayes
Martindale-Hubbell® highest peer rating · Since 2009