-
Former Maricopa County Prosecutors -
AV Preeminent Rated -
Top 100 Trial Lawyers -
Ranked #1 Ranking Arizona 5 Consecutive Years
Phoenix Sexual Conduct with a Minor Attorney
Defending Against ARS 13-1405 Charges in Arizona
A charge under ARS 13-1405 — sexual conduct with a minor — is one of the most serious accusations a person can face in Arizona. The potential penalties include decades in state prison, lifetime sex offender registration, and consequences that follow you for the rest of your life. If you or someone you love has been accused or arrested, contacting an experienced Phoenix sexual conduct with a minor attorney immediately is not optional — it is urgent.
At MayesTelles PLLC, our criminal defense attorneys include former Maricopa County prosecutors who have handled these cases from both sides of the courtroom. We know exactly how the State builds these charges, what evidence they rely on, and where the weaknesses in their case are. That knowledge is what we use to fight for you.
Reach a Phoenix ARS 13-1405 defense attorney at (602) 428-7104 for a free, confidential consultation. We are available 24/7.
Sexual Conduct with a Minor — Our Case Results
MayesTelles PLLC has achieved complete dismissals and acquittals in some of the most serious sexual conduct with a minor cases in Maricopa County. The following results represent actual outcomes our attorneys have obtained for clients facing ARS 13-1405 and related charges.
Charge | Outcome | Court |
18 counts: Child Molestation, Sexual Conduct with a Minor, Aggravated Assault (DCAC) | Half dismissed pre-trial — jury acquitted on ALL remaining counts | Maricopa County Superior Court |
5 felony counts: 2x Sexual Conduct with a Minor, 3x Molestation of a Child (DCAC) | Complete case dismissal — Motion to Dismiss granted | Maricopa County Superior Court |
Sexual Conduct with a Minor — Dangerous Crime Against Children | Complete case dismissal | Maricopa County Superior Court |
Every case is different. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. We share these results to demonstrate that complete dismissals in DCAC-level sex crimes cases are possible with aggressive, experienced representation.
What Is Sexual Conduct with a Minor Under Arizona Law?
Arizona Revised Statute 13-1405 defines the crime as follows:
"A person commits sexual conduct with a minor by intentionally or knowingly engaging in sexual intercourse or oral sexual contact with any person who is under eighteen years of age."
Sexual intercourse, as defined under Arizona law, includes any sexual act involving penetration into the penis, vulva, or anus by any part of a body or object, or masturbatory contact with the penis or vulva. Oral sexual contact means oral contact with the vulva or penis.
This offense is commonly referred to as statutory rape in other states. A key aspect of ARS 13-1405 is that consent is not a defense — if the other person is under eighteen years of age, the law treats the conduct as criminal regardless of whether the minor appeared to consent.
Who Can Be Charged Under ARS 13-1405?
ARS 13-1405 can be charged against any person who engages in the defined sexual conduct with someone under 18. The severity of the charges increases dramatically depending on the age of the alleged victim and the relationship between the defendant and the minor. People most commonly charged under this statute include:
- Adults who had consensual sexual relationships with teenagers between the ages of 15 and 17
- Teachers, coaches, tutors, or other school personnel defined under the statute as being in a position of trust
- Adults who met a minor online and engaged in sexual activity
- People accused by a minor or the minor's parents despite a mutually consensual encounter
- Individuals where the minor misrepresented their age
It is critical to understand that claiming you did not know the other person was a minor is generally not a valid defense under Arizona law. This makes experienced legal representation essential from the moment you are aware of an investigation.
ARS 13-1405 Charges and Penalties
The penalties vary significantly depending on the age of the alleged victim. The distinction between victims under 15 and those aged 15 to 17 creates two very different legal situations — one involving Arizona's Dangerous Crimes Against Children (DCAC) statute (ARS 13-705), which imposes mandatory flat sentences measured in decades
When the Alleged Victim Is 15, 16, or 17 Years Old
If the alleged victim is between 15 and 17 years of age, sexual conduct with a minor is charged as a Class 6 felony — the lowest felony class in Arizona. However, the charge escalates to a Class 2 felony if the defendant was or is in a position of trust with the minor (teacher, coach, youth leader, guardian, or parent).
When the Alleged Victim Is Under 15 Years Old
When the alleged victim is under the age of 15, ARS 13-1405 becomes a Class 2 felony charged as a Dangerous Crime Against Children (DCAC) under ARS 13-705. This triggers a separate, far harsher sentencing structure with mandatory flat-time prison sentences — meaning every day must be served with no possibility of early release, probation, or pardon on most bases.
- Victim Age: 15–17 (no trust relationship)
- Felony Class: Class 6 Felony
- First Offense Range: Probation to 2 years
- Notes: Probation eligible
- Victim Age: 15–17 (position of trust)
- Felony Class: Class 2 Felony
- First Offense Range: 3 to 12.5 years
- Notes: No probation
- Victim Age: 12–14 (DCAC)
- Felony Class: Class 2 Felony (DCAC)
- First Offense Range: 13 to 27 years (flat)
- Notes: No probation; stacked counts
- Victim Age: Under 12 (DCAC)
- Felony Class: Class 2 Felony (DCAC)
- First Offense Range: 35 years to natural life
- Notes: No early release until 35 years served
Under DCAC sentencing, sentences for multiple counts are served consecutively — stacked back-to-back. A person charged with multiple counts involving a victim under 15 faces the mathematical reality of potential lifetime incarceration. If the defendant has a prior predicate felony, the mandatory minimums increase substantially.
Important: Predicate felony priors increase DCAC sentencing ranges significantly. Our attorneys analyze your complete history at the first consultation to identify every sentencing risk you face.
Mitigation for Class 6 Felony Cases
When the alleged victim is between 15 and 17 years old and no position of trust is involved, a conviction carries a Class 6 felony — where probation is available for first-time offenders. In these cases, the difference between a prison sentence and a probationary outcome often comes down to mitigation.
Our attorneys work with clients early in the case to build a comprehensive mitigation package that demonstrates to the court why a non-prison sentence is appropriate. Mitigation in ARS 13-1405 cases can include:
- Psychosexual risk assessment conducted by an independent licensed evaluator — assesses recidivism risk and is one of the most persuasive tools available in sentencing hearings
- Voluntary polygraph examination in appropriate cases — can support credibility and risk assessment findings
- Voluntary enrollment in counseling or therapy prior to sentencing
- Character references from employers, clergy, family members, and community leaders
- Documented history of positive community contributions — employment, military service, civic involvement
- Expert testimony challenging the prosecution's characterization of the defendant's risk level
Mitigation is not an admission of guilt — it is a strategic tool that operates in parallel with the defense of the charges themselves. Our attorneys evaluate whether mitigation is appropriate in your case from the first consultation.
Sex Offender Registration Requirements
A conviction under ARS 13-1405 carries mandatory lifetime registration as a sex offender in Arizona under ARS 13-3821. Sex offender registration imposes significant restrictions on where you can live, work, and travel, including:
- Requirement to update registration with any home or business address changes
- Residency restrictions limiting proximity to schools, parks, and locations where children congregate
- Driver's license designation identifying you as a sex offender
- Registration in any state you visit for 10 or more days
- Potential public notification, depending on your tier classification
Defenses Against ARS 13-1405 Charges
Being charged under ARS 13-1405 does not mean you will be convicted. Our attorneys scrutinize every element of the State's case to find weaknesses, procedural errors, and constitutional violations that can change the outcome.
The Alleged Victim Was 18 or Older
ARS 13-1405 only applies to sexual conduct with someone under the age of 18. If the alleged victim was in fact 18 years of age or older at the time of the alleged conduct, the statute does not apply. We investigate the actual age of the alleged victim and challenge all identification evidence.
Mistaken Identity or False Accusation
Sexual misconduct accusations are sometimes motivated by anger, jealousy, custody disputes, or a desire for revenge. Our firm has handled cases where a minor made a false accusation during a contested divorce or where a teenager fabricated an encounter out of spite. We investigate the accuser's credibility, history, and potential motives from day one. In the case of Client RJ — charged with 18 counts, including Sexual Conduct with a Minor — we forced dismissal of half the counts pre-trial and the jury acquitted on all remaining counts at trial.
Lack of the Required Mental State
ARS 13-1405 requires that the conduct be intentional or knowing. If circumstances existed that undermined the defendant's awareness of the other person's age — such as the minor actively misrepresenting themselves on an app with an age requirement — these facts are relevant to the defense, even if they are not a complete statutory defense.
Constitutional Challenges: Illegal Search or Seizure
Many ARS 13-1405 cases involve electronic evidence — text messages, social media communications, photos, or app data. If law enforcement obtained this evidence without a valid warrant or exceeded the scope of their warrant, we move to suppress that evidence. Evidence obtained in violation of your Fourth Amendment rights cannot be used against you.
Challenging Forensic and Expert Evidence
Physical forensic evidence in these cases — DNA, medical examination findings, and digital forensics — is only as reliable as the methodology used to collect and analyze it. We retain independent child sexual abuse examination (CSAE) experts to challenge prosecution medical witnesses where physical examination findings are in dispute. Our attorneys also work with independent digital forensics experts to scrutinize the State's digital evidence for collection errors, chain of custody issues, and analytical flaws.
Romeo and Juliet Protections
Arizona's Romeo and Juliet law provides protection for defendants when, at the time of the alleged offense: the victim was between 15 and 17 years old; the defendant was 19 years old or was a current high school student; and the defendant was no more than two years older than the minor. If these conditions are met and the sexual activity was consensual, this statutory protection may apply.
Marriage Exception
Under Arizona Revised Statutes § 25-102, a person who is at least 16 years old but under 18 may get married with a parent or guardian's consent, provided the prospective spouse is not more than three years older. In cases where the defendant and the alleged victim were lawfully married at the time of the alleged conduct, this exception may apply. Arizona law does not permit anyone under 16 to legally marry.
Why Your Choice of Attorney Matters
In ARS 13-1405 cases, the difference between a conviction with mandatory decades in prison and a dismissal often comes down to how aggressively and knowledgeably your attorney attacks the State's case before trial. At MayesTelles PLLC:
- Multiple attorneys on our team previously served as Maricopa County prosecutors who handled sex crimes cases — we know how the prosecution builds these files
- We have achieved complete dismissals of multiple-count DCAC-level sex offense cases through successful motions to dismiss, as demonstrated in our case results above
- We evaluate every case with a focus on pre-indictment intervention — early action can prevent charges from being filed at all
- We handle both state and federal charges, which matters when investigations involve digital evidence crossing state lines
Our attorneys are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, because we understand that arrests and investigations do not happen on a schedule.
What Happens After an Arrest for ARS 13-1405?
- Initial arrest and booking — remain silent and request an attorney immediately
- Initial appearance (usually within 24 hours) — a judge sets conditions of release
- Preliminary hearing or grand jury proceeding — the State presents evidence to establish probable cause
- Arraignment — formal charges are read, and a not guilty plea is entered
- Pre-trial conferences and motions — where experienced attorneys can challenge evidence and potentially obtain dismissal
- Trial or negotiated resolution
The most critical window is between the investigation and the filing of charges. If you know you are under investigation — or have had contact with law enforcement — contacting MayesTelles immediately gives our team the opportunity to intervene before charges are filed.
Contact a Phoenix Sexual Conduct with a Minor Attorney Today
If you or a family member has been charged with or is under investigation for sexual conduct with a minor in Arizona, the time to act is now. The earlier you engage experienced defense counsel, the more options are available.
MayesTelles PLLC has achieved complete dismissals in DCAC-level sex crimes cases. Our former prosecutors know how the State builds these cases — and we know how to dismantle them. We offer free, confidential consultations and flexible payment plans.
Get a free consultation. Call our Phoenix ARS 13-1405 defense attorneys at (602) 428-7104. Available 24/7. Your call is completely confidential.
FAQs About ARS 13-1405
-
Is this the same as statutory rape?
Yes. Arizona does not use the term "statutory rape" in its statutes, but ARS 13-1405 is the functional equivalent. If you have been charged under the colloquial "statutory rape" label, the actual charge is ARS 13-1405. See our related Statutory Rape page for information on the Romeo and Juliet law and age of consent in Arizona.
-
Will I have to register as a sex offender for life?
In most cases involving a conviction under ARS 13-1405, lifetime sex offender registration is required. The specific tier and associated restrictions depend on the offense and risk assessment process. Our attorneys challenge registration determinations where legally available and pursue every post-conviction avenue to minimize long-term consequences.
-
Can the charges be dropped before trial?
Yes. Through pre-trial motions — including motions to suppress evidence, motions to dismiss, and challenges to the State's probable cause — our attorneys have achieved complete case dismissals for clients facing multiple DCAC-level sex offense charges. The viability of pre-trial resolution depends entirely on the specific facts of your case.
-
What is the difference between ARS 13-1405 and ARS 13-1406?
ARS 13-1406 is Arizona's sexual assault statute and requires proof of non-consent. ARS 13-1405 does not require proof of non-consent — the minor's age alone establishes the criminal nature of the conduct. This is an important distinction because ARS 13-1405 charges can arise even from relationships that appeared consensual to both parties.
-
Can I be charged if the minor consented?
Yes. Under Arizona law, a person under the age of 18 cannot legally consent to sexual activity with an adult. The State does not need to prove force or objection. The minor's age alone is the determining factor.
-
What if the minor lied about their age?
Arizona courts have generally held that a good-faith belief about the minor's age is not a complete defense to ARS 13-1405 charges. However, the circumstances under which the defendant came to believe the other person was an adult can be relevant to both defenses and sentencing. This is a fact-specific analysis our attorneys conduct case by case.
We've Won Thousands of Cases
-
Charges Reduced
MayesTelles client, R.J., charged with 18 counts of sexual abuse. Client was facing life in prison without parole. Results: Half of the charges were dismissed before trial, at trial the jury acquitted him on all remaining counts.
-
Child Molestation, Sexual Conduct with a Minor, and Aggravated Assault
Client RJ was falsely accused of 18 counts Child Molestation, Sexual Conduct with a Minor, and Aggravated Assault. During the course of their representation, the attorneys at MayesTelles were able to force the State to dismiss half of the counts. The case proceeded to trial on the remaining counts. Following a lengthy trial, the jury acquitted RJ of all charges.
-
Client Acquitted in Jury Trial
Client JG was charged with Indecent Exposure, a Class 1 Misdemeanor, in the East Mesa Justice Court. We had a jury trial and JG was acquitted of the charge.
-
Client Charged with Prostitution
MayesTelles was able to achieve a case dismissal on behalf of a client charged with Prostitution.
-
Client Faced 5 Felony Sex Offenses
Our client, Mr. C., was charged with five counts of felony sex offenses, including two counts of Sex Conduct with a Minor and three counts of Molestation of a Child. We were able to get the case dismissed upon a successful Motion to Dismiss. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
-
Dangerous Crime Against Children Charge
Our client was charged with Sexual Conduct with a Minor, which in Arizona is a Dangerous Crime Against Children. We were able to take this serious felony sex offense and achieve a complete case dismissal for our client.
Why Choose MayesTelles PLLC?
-
Nearly 200 Years of Combined Experience
-
Thousands of Cases Successfully Handled
-
Voted Top 100 Trial Lawyers
-
Available to Our Clients 24/7
-
Former Prosecutors & Law Enforcement
-
AV Preeminent Rated Attorneys